AuthorHeather ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Safari Versus Chrome For Mac10/16/2021
It has over two-thirds of the desktop market share compared to Safari’s 10 percent. Chrome is the market leader in browser market share by a large margin. Apples Safari, Googles Chrome, and Mozillas Firefox Microsoft announced that it officially.Google Chrome vs Safari on Mac. Details: Comparing the Microsoft Edge browser for Mac vs. Safari started to block all third party cookies in 2003 with the release of Safari version 1. While ITP (Intelligent Tracking Protection) started in 2017 indeed, Safari has been blocking all third party (and thus all tracking) cookies since almost forever.Everyone who wants to understand the dynamic needs to look into the relationship between Apple and ad tech, with Apple's recent counter-move being the addition of ITP 2.2. While mainstream media starts to discover the existence of third-party cookies, which had been a known issue for around 20 years, Big Tech tracking has already moved to first-party tracking, fingerpringing and cache tracking.For example, Facebook switched to first-party cookie tracking in 2018. The author probably had the conclusion of the article in mind (setting up good Firefox against evil Chrome) before looking for supporting arguments.It's a bit ironic. Without it, tracking doesnt even need cookies."If you only block cookies, you still have all the other storage and stateful things to worry about." - Safari ITP engineer John Wilander Also the spin of the article is slightly dishonest, simply turning off third-party cookies in Chrome achieves to negate most of the explicit criticism in the article. Safari, Chrome.Not only that, Safari also started to partition web cache in 2013, and it's still the only browser with such partitioning. If you’re on a Mac, Google Chrome vs Safari is a closer race.Windows PC users can play Cloud Gaming titles through the native Xbox app, and it is also available via a web browser on iOS, Mac and Chromebook.
![]() We had prototypes working in ~2012, if my memory serves. The decision by Mozilla to block all third-party cookies in 2013 was reverted in fear of Ad-Tech.Mozilla is better at marketing than with the technology, and still hasn't enabled tracking-protection except for new users.I'm one of the many devs who worked at one point or another on Mozilla's third-party tracking protection. In fact, Firefox never did anything pro-actively to make ad-tech sweat. Firefox doesn't play much of a role in this fight. The tech world has a short memory, but I remember Apple being caught red-handed slurping data from user's iPhones not so long ago. We're doing it slowly, because by opposition to Apple, we cannot afford to break the web.Why did Apple do this, though? If you recall, Apple's stance on privacy is quite recent. Kudos to them, now we can finally release this technology. The web was simply not ready for such protection.Now, Apple, with their iOS monopoly, managed to strong-arm the web into a position in which third-party tracking protection was finally possible. Apple has been mostly criticized for allowing apps to collect excessive user data-for example, apps could access contacts at first without permission. Also, unless things have changed (honestly, I haven't followed), Apple tracks users through their native apps, because you're pretty much obligated to go through Apple's SDKs for many things, and they require a tracking ID, which brings revenue to Apple.This is incredibly misleading. The tech world has a short memory, but I remember Apple being caught red-handed slurping data from user's iPhones not so long ago. We're also working on it (is anyone else doing so?), but that will be a tough fight.> Why did Apple do this, though? If you recall, Apple's stance on privacy is quite recent. We're working on it at this very moment.Finally, yeah, first-party cookies. But don't forget that they do this for strategic reasons: 1/ because they want to encourage devs to use another tracking mechanism that the competition cannot emulate 2/ to immediately hurt the competition.Now, you are right about the double-keyed caches – although using this to track users is quite more complicated, less precise and less reliable than first-/third-party cookies, it's something we need to address. But it's all painstakingly disclosed and its practices around differential privacy, deletion, and so on are quite good.The tracking ID was Apple throwing a bone to ad industry and app makers, when it shut down far more precise ways of tracking users.> If you recall, Apple's stance on privacy is quite recentApple's position on privacy really started accelerating in the pro-privacy direction in 2011 due to the issue around unencrypted location backups, which was also around the time Tim Cook took over. For Siri or app analytics. For example, apps in iOS 13 cannot access bluetooth or Wifi information by default, since it was being used to infer location.Apple does of course collect some user data, e.g. It's super hard to add things to collect because above the privacy impact there's also typically a battery impact.It's hard to take anything you write seriously when you're being disingenuous.>Unfortunately, these prototypes broke the web badly. All things you would expect ANY vendor to do. They do track things like crashes, other issues, general 3p app usage (for understanding what's important to their customers), & their own apps. The tech world has a short memory, but I remember Apple being caught red-handed slurping data from user's iPhones not so long agoWhich instance are you referring to? (sounds like the GPS incident above which doesn't seem recent to me).> Also, unless things have changed (honestly, I haven't followed), Apple tracks users through their native apps, because you're pretty much obligated to go through Apple's SDKs for many things, and they require a tracking ID, which brings revenue to Apple.AFAIK Apple doesn't track what you do within the app. Having worked there 6 years ago I can tell you that not only did Apple have internal messaging about privacy being important, they walked the walk in terms of supporting initiatives to continue to push the envelope.> If you recall, Apple's stance on privacy is quite recent. Convert estimate to invoice on quickbooks for macWe should rejoice that Apple is monetizing privacy, because it means the system is working.>We're also working on it (is anyone else doing so?)GP literally just mentioned expiring first-party cookies after 7-days.I don't trust Mozilla _at all_ these days. Is this the privacy-invading data "slurp" you mean?>But don't forget that they do this for strategic reasonsWho doesn't? Apple is not a charity. The tech world has a short memory, but I remember Apple being caught red-handed slurping data from user's iPhones not so long ago.A quick Google search shows that Apple was embroiled because they enabled WiFi-assist by default, which caused some people to use more cellular data than intended. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |